Skip to content
Liquid Egg Product

Liquid Egg Product

  • Home
  • Science/Technology
  • Don Borst has trouble seeing multiple points of view

Don Borst has trouble seeing multiple points of view

Posted on December 1, 2008 By Liquid Egg Product 8 Comments on Don Borst has trouble seeing multiple points of view
Science/Technology

Like fast food, there is a ceiling to the expected quality of most sports articles. But this one made me want to rant.

Some guy Don Borst has a couple beefs with the BCS computer rankings:

1. The computers rank Oklahoma ahead of Texas, despite Texas beating OU earlier in the year.

2. Alabama is no longer ranked #1 by the computers even though they won convincingly last game and are undefeated. (“It’s as if the computers realized that to get their beloved Sooners into the Big 12 title game, they had to push OU past the 12-0 Crimson Tide, too.” lolz QQ moar nub)

He can’t seem to figure out why these situations could happen and blames “ridiculous” computer rankings. Here’s some help for him:

1. He treats the Big 12 tie like it’s a two-way. It’s not. It’s a three-way, including Texas Tech. The reason why humans are discounting TTU is they lost by 40+ to OU. Yet humans are the ones who insisted that the computer rankings not take point differential into account. Mr. Borst does not seem to be aware of this.

2. Most computers give bonuses to teams that beat top 25 teams. Alabama didn’t get moved down because they won 36-0; it’s because Oklahoma beat a highly ranked team, while Alabama beat a scrub. (Texas is also above Alabama due to superior strength of schedule.)

Boise State, Utah, and Ball State are undefeated, yet are not top-ranked because they haven’t played enough good teams. Same as Alabama.

3. The useful thing about computers is that once you determine the formula; the calculations are unbiased. Humans have unreliable memory, cannot take all games into account, are heavily influenced by recent events, and have in-born biases.

This is not to say that’s he’s wrong about Texas being more deserving than OU. The difference in teams’ playing strength is razor-thin, though, and solid arguments can be made for both sides. This is a perfect situation for letting computers determine the outcome.

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Fail
Next Post: Eat fresh. ❯

8 thoughts on “Don Borst has trouble seeing multiple points of view”

  1. annie says:
    December 1, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    i don’t understand why there has to be a human component to begin with. if this was going to come down to who liked who the most, why bother crushing their young bones the damn game? just dress up the boys in nothing but those tight game pants and make a calendar or something.

    Reply
  2. Q says:
    December 1, 2008 at 10:42 pm

    COMMENTARY FAIL!

    Someone should say that to Don Borst.

    Reply
  3. Phalen says:
    December 2, 2008 at 2:52 pm

    Amen,

    I was searching for this Borst guy’s email address and found your article. I’ll admit my bias up front…. I went to OU and am a Sooner fan. I do agree that Texas has a legitimate beef, and if the situation were reversed, I’d be a bit peeved as well.

    Your post mirrored my sentiments. Humans demanded the computer rankings take margin of victory out. If that component still existed, the computers would think less highly of Texas Tech, who is ranked #4 in their eyes. If Tech were dropped further because of their margin of loss, maybe Texas ends up higher than OU.

    You also made the great point that Don is missing. It is not a two-way tie and if if were, head-to-head is the first tie-breaker. In one breath, this baffoon wants to remove Tech from the argument because of margin of victory and then complain that margin of victory should be removed so Texas would be ahead of OU.

    If we truly take out the margin-of-victory factor, I’d see it this way: Texas and Tech lost true road games, so drop OU out because they lost on a neutral field. This would leave Tech and Texas and Tech would win the head-to-head and head to KC next Saturday.

    Reply
  4. Tommyg says:
    December 2, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    Computers should decide the outcome a playoff should. Why there is no playoff is incomprehensible to me. Maybe Rybka should decide the national championship??

    Reply
  5. Tommyg says:
    December 2, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    Whoops, I meant to say that a computer should NOT decide the college national champ..an on field playoff should.. 🙂

    Reply
  6. Donnie says:
    December 2, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    @Annie: Humans like power. Besides, they think because most humans agree, the computers must be wrong.

    And you can keep the calendar, thanks.

    @Q: Yes, that is perfect.

    @Phalen: Thanks for your input. Normally, I don’t read sports articles and this one affirms why.

    @Tommyg: Hey, good to see you around. What happened to your blog?

    As far as a playoff, it would in a sense be optimal. (Since the teams have to win best out of 1, it’s actually a poor way to find the “best” team, but that can’t be avoided with football.) But it would take “student-athletes” out of class too long…

    Reply
  7. Tommyg says:
    December 2, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    I found myself spending too much time on my blog and not enough time on music (my career) and chess (my hobby). So I deleted the blog in a very spontaneous moment. I am not so sure that deleting it was the best move I have ever made, but I have gotten back to being more productive.

    As for the being out of class too long argument, the schools could just play one less regular season game (but they would never go for that..too much money would be lost)

    Reply
  8. Chessyman says:
    December 10, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    Hello friend you have a very nice blog here…well done…check our too: http://homeofchess.blogspot.com
    I am sure you gonna love it.I humbly request you place a link of our blog in your blogroll.Your blog is already in our blogroll.Now why you should link to us?Just go through our blog you will know coz we provide quality content & have a good reader base.You may also like take a look at this post : http://homeofchess.blogspot.com/2008/12/write-for-chess-blog.html
    I really look forward to have a good relationship with you.Have a good day & keep up the good work.You can reach me at thechessyman@gmail.com
    Waiting for a prompt reply from your side.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • 2020 was so bad, we didn’t make a single post
  • Monday Fighter!
  • King Safety
  • So, no rematch?
  • Estimate how much this cost

Recent Comments

  • annie on 2020 was so bad, we didn’t make a single post
  • annie on One could argue he’d make a poor preacher
  • annie on Monday Fighter!
  • Q on Monday Fighter!
  • annie on Monday Fighter!

Archives

  • January 2021
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • June 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007

Categories

  • Babes & Alleged Babes
  • Bad Ads
  • Bad Movie Night
  • Blog News
  • Burning Agony
  • CG
  • Chess
  • Computer-fu
  • Corridors & Creatures
  • Eggony
  • Eggs Vs Humans
  • Entertainment
  • Gaming
  • Grilled Cheese
  • History
  • In the News
  • Mascot for President
  • Mathematics
  • Monday Fighter!
  • North Korea
  • Patently Ineffective
  • Random
  • Religion
  • Science/Technology
  • Snake Oil
  • Sports
  • Tournament of Lepers
  • Uncategorized
  • Uncomfortability
  • Weaksauce Losers

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2021 Liquid Egg Product.

Theme: Oceanly by ScriptsTown