Skip to content
Liquid Egg Product

Liquid Egg Product

  • Home
  • Chess
  • Houston Open #3: the 1252 kid

Houston Open #3: the 1252 kid

Posted on July 29, 2009 By Liquid Egg Product 5 Comments on Houston Open #3: the 1252 kid
Chess

Third time’s a charm. Maybe this would be the game I didn’t go down a Bishop. It would help if I played a tactically poor opponent.

Looking at my bespectacled, Indian opponent, I could see the bloom of new life in him. He couldn’t have been alive for more than eight or nine years. Knowing he started 1.5/2, I fully expected him to play a few hundred points above his rating.

He seemed a bit shy, but not so much that he wouldn’t talk at all. I asked him about the tournament so far; it turned out his first “game” was a full-point bye. It was a bit of a relief to know he wasn’t simply having a monster tournament.

As usual, we shook hands before the game started, but he gave this really limp handshake. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt because he was young and shy. But it felt like one of those weak, awkward handshakes some women give, because they think you’ll take it as a sign of sexual attraction if the hand contact lasts a tenth of a second more than absolutely necessary.

As the game went on, I noticed Mr. Jacob looking at other games. A lot. It didn’t seem like he was ever looking at our board when it wasn’t his turn. It’s almost like he didn’t have the attention span to play a G/120. Once I actually started playing with a plan (after noticing “Wow, I can expand on the Kingside!”), there was very little reason to doubt victory. Black never had a serious threat the entire game.

(show chess board)(hide chess board)

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Houston Open #2: Sweating it out
Next Post: Houston Open #4: The Thief of Time ❯

5 thoughts on “Houston Open #3: the 1252 kid”

  1. Blunderprone says:
    July 29, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    Because this was a kid you played, I could not help but be reminded of one of my favorite children stories, Where the Wild Things Are, by Maurice Sendak.

    In this case, you are not Max NOR are you his fictitious monsters, rather you are the dog who he chased with the fork, dressed in a wolf costume before being sent to his room by his mother. Seen in the first six moves, I have to ask, why 6.d3? Poor dog, did Max stab you with a fork? He just made e5 weak. Move to d4 instead. It’s more in theme and would have taken him out of the wolf costume.

    Now here is where you started to join in the monster fantasy of Max as he played in his room. As Max stared into their yellow eyes without blinking once ( at other games around him even), he was under the false security of thinking he was their king. The harmless monster on g4 had no way back but since it menaced your queen, it spooked you into moving 11 Qd3 which creates a backward queen pawn. He trapped his light squared bishop in. Face the monster, Boo! 11 h3. Learn to recognize when you are hallucinating someone else’s fantasies or Oedipal transference of anger.

    If that wasn’t enough, Max really showed how he hated his monsters on 18…e5. Putting pawns on the square of the same color as his bishop in the end game can’t be good and shows he hates his bishop which is really a manifestation of his anger towards his mother sending him to his room.

    Your wild rumpus could have started with move 34 Re6 if 34… Nc7 then 35 Re7. If Rd8 then Re7 anyway followed by Be5. You did follow through with the point and not much gnashing of teeth and eye rolling. I hope the child got eat supper that night.

    Reply
  2. CMoB says:
    July 29, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    11. Qe2.

    Reply
  3. tacticus maximus says:
    July 30, 2009 at 7:23 am

    “… awkward handshakes some women give, because they think you’ll take it as a sign of sexual attraction if the hand contact lasts a tenth of a second more than absolutely necessary.”

    It’s the shirt, dude. 🙂

    Nice game, though! Sorry I wasn’t able to stop by the tournament.

    Reply
  4. The Mascot says:
    July 30, 2009 at 9:55 am

    You’re wrong about the handshakes. When women shake my hand, it’s not because they’re afraid of me, they’re afraid of themselves. They know they can’t keep themselves from jumping all over me after experiencing full hand-to-hand contact. At least, that’s been my experience.

    Reply
  5. Donnie says:
    July 31, 2009 at 1:21 am

    @Blunderprone: Wish I was familiar with that story. It’s probably short enough so I can read it quickly now, but…it’s after midnight *whine*

    6. d4 does seem to make more sense. Plus it keeps the Knight off c5 and e5.

    I didn’t really think about how he was restricting his Bishop with e5. Even after the pawns were cleared, that Bishop never seemed to be an effective piece.

    @CMoB: You know, that’s not a bad idea. My Queen is probably going to be better, so I don’t want to trade.

    @Tacticus: Hahaha. Of course. Maybe next time, I’ll wear my too-tight Turkey Bowl T-shirt.

    @Mascot: That reminds me. I’ve hired a lab to start drug testing all LEP employees.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Blunderprone Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • 2020 was so bad, we didn’t make a single post
  • Monday Fighter!
  • King Safety
  • So, no rematch?
  • Estimate how much this cost

Recent Comments

  • Q on 2020 was so bad, we didn’t make a single post
  • annie on 2020 was so bad, we didn’t make a single post
  • annie on One could argue he’d make a poor preacher
  • annie on Monday Fighter!
  • Q on Monday Fighter!

Archives

  • January 2021
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • June 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007

Categories

  • Babes & Alleged Babes
  • Bad Ads
  • Bad Movie Night
  • Blog News
  • Burning Agony
  • CG
  • Chess
  • Computer-fu
  • Corridors & Creatures
  • Eggony
  • Eggs Vs Humans
  • Entertainment
  • Gaming
  • Grilled Cheese
  • History
  • In the News
  • Mascot for President
  • Mathematics
  • Monday Fighter!
  • North Korea
  • Patently Ineffective
  • Random
  • Religion
  • Science/Technology
  • Snake Oil
  • Sports
  • Tournament of Lepers
  • Uncategorized
  • Uncomfortability
  • Weaksauce Losers

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2021 Liquid Egg Product.

Theme: Oceanly by ScriptsTown